Commonwealth ministers of education recently outlined their vision for education’s role in the new global goals for development, emphasizing education’s catalytic power and stressing the need for equity and quality in addition to access.
By Jonathan Penson, education adviser at the Commonwealth Secretariat.
The Commonwealth is an association of 54 countries united both by shared values and by great diversity. It consists of developed and developing countries, rich and poor, large and small. It is home to 2 billion citizens of all faiths and ethnicities, more than half of whom are 25 years old or under.
The end of the MDG and EFA period in 2015 will signal a paradigm shift in the global development framework. Commonwealth ministers of education met in London in December 2012 and developed recommendations for post-2015 which are now feeding into the UN discussions and wider debates. This blog post provides a summary.
Much has already been written about the need to re-focus on learning without compromising efforts to secure 100% access; to align the EFA and education MDG frameworks; and to pay more attention to equity. Commonwealth ministers correspondingly recommend that three core concerns – access, quality and equity – should run through all education goals, and that EFA and MDGs should be harmonized to avoid overlaps or gaps.
In their meeting statement, Commonwealth Ministers of Education reaffirmed the centrality of education to all development objectives. This summary provides more details on the ministers’ recommendations. The rationale for the recommendations can be found in this background paper, while this issues paper identifies education priority areas in the Commonwealth. We would welcome your engagement in the continuing discussions on education in the Commonwealth via comments to this blog and via our web forum. For information contact: email@example.com.
The Commonwealth ministers propose the following structure for education’s place in the post-2015 development framework:
Three principal goals for education should be contained in the post-2015 development framework, in a similar place to the current education MDGs. The principal goals would be supplemented by six more detailed, subordinate goals. These would have a similar function to the current EFA goals. Targets and deadlines would focus on 2025, but options would be available for individual countries, depending on starting point, ambition and capacity.
Although the opportunity to revise and revitalise the global development agenda is exciting, we must not forget that the original MDGs and EFA goals are unfinished business. For many countries, they will remain unfulfilled by 2015, even with a ‘final push’ to achieve them. Access – with learning – remains a primary concern, and is encapsulated in Principal Goal 1:
Every child completes a full cycle of a minimum of nine years of continuous, free basic education and demonstrates learning achievement consistent with national standards.
Learning is rightfully being focused on in the debates about the post-2015 framework. This is partly because of the problem of children being in school but failing to become proficient in basic skills, and partly due to access having previously been prioritized due to the phrasing of the current MDGs.
Learning is at the heart of education. It should be locally relevant but globally useable; attainable but ambitious; based on tried and tested methodologies but flexible enough to respond to 21st century challenges. But quality learning depends on quality in other domains, such as education management, participation of the community, quality assurance mechanisms, policy and strategy, and support from development partners. Hence ministers chose ‘quality’ as a core principle. The relevance aspect of quality, education’s role in individual and economic development, and the wish to set ambitious targets for all countries, is reflected in Principal Goal 2:
Post-basic education expanded strategically to meet needs for knowledge and skills related to employment and livelihoods.
Ministers are keen that development goals are not seen as relevant only to developing countries. There is no country, developed or developing, which does not need to attend to issues with access, quality, and – particularly – equity. The connections between disadvantage and lack of fulfilment of individual potential – and therefore a nation’s potential – are clear. Principal Goal 3 sets a clear target to address this:
Reduce and seek to eliminate differences in educational outcomes among learners associated with household wealth, gender, special needs, location, age and social group.
The six Sub-Goals support increased access, quality and equity:
i. Reduce and seek to eliminate early childhood under-nutrition and avoidable childhood disease, and universalize access to community-based early childhood education and development and pre-school below age 6.
ii. Universalize an ‘expanded vision of access’ to a full cycle of a minimum of nine years of continuous basic education.
Successful achievement of national learning outcomes in cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains for both primary and lower secondary cycles at age appropriate levels up to the age of 15.
iii. Invest strategically in expanded and equitable access to post-basic and tertiary level education and training linked to wellbeing, livelihoods and employment and the transition to responsible adult citizenship.
iv. Eliminate illiteracy and innumeracy among those under 50.
Provide education opportunities for young people and adults who have not successfully completed nine years of basic education.
v. Reduce and seek to eliminate disparities in participation in education at school level linked to wealth, location, special needs, age, gender and social group and ensure all children have equal educational opportunities and reduce gaps in measured outcomes.
vi. Provide adequate infrastructure for learning according to national norms for buildings, basic services, safety, learning materials, and learning infrastructure within appropriate distances of households.
In order to focus efforts on the children who are hardest to reach – and to ensure that the challenges of environmental change are addressed by education – Commonwealth ministers propose four cross-cutting themes to be addressed by all education goals:
a) Education in emergencies – conflict and disaster risk reduction integrated into national education sector plans.
b) Migration – All migrants of school age or who are education professionals recorded in monitoring of education goals by the host country to inform policy formulation.
c) Gender – All reporting and evaluation of the development goals disaggregated by sex and analysed through a gender lens.
d) Education for sustainable development – Education for sustainable development mainstreamed in all education policies, teacher and school leader preparation, and curricula.
Photo: A child at Dindi Primary School in Mwandama Millennium Village, Malawi (UN Photo/Evan Schneider)